Entangled Media Histories

A research network for European media historians since 2013

Grid View

Report from EMHIS IX, 21 May 2021

It was a warm and welcoming atmosphere as we joined EMHIS IX online from various places (home and work offices), different time zones, and countries in Europe (and beyond). The Covid-19 pandemic might have put a spanner in the works on international travel but with the wonder of Zoom and the Wonder meeting platforms we were able to get together again as a group. EMHIS IX was organised in collaboration with DigitalHistory@Lund, a research platform run by the Section for Media History and the Centre for the History of Knowledge (LUCK) at Lund University (Sweden), which also set the theme for the conference: ‘Digital Sources, Digital Methods’.

The day began with news and updates from the EMHIS steering committee, and we were also reminded of our last (in person) gathering in the enchantingly setting of green hills and grounds, of Gregynog Hall, in May 2019. Little did we know then how much our work, research, and every day (social) experience, would change moving forward to May 2021.


EMHIS IX “corridor chat” on the Wonder platform in between Zoom sessions.

After a brief news update from the steering committee our first session began. This session included short introductory presentations from new EMHIS members. First out was Hermann Breitenborn (Hamburg University, Germany) who talked about the city of Hamburg and its districts, and how the city was in focus in the so called ‘St. Pauli films’ or ‘Hamburg films’ of the 1960s and 1970s. What shots and locations were used to create the image of the city? A transnational theme was also introduced as many of the film rights were sold internationally. Our second speaker Mari Pajala (University of Turku, Finland) talked about her research on Finnish television, for example, Cold War era contacts between Finnish television and state-socialist television, before introducing her current research on Nordvision – a network of Nordic public service broadcasters established in 1959 to encourage programme exchange, co-operation, and a sense of a Nordic community. From Nordvision to Swedish television, our third speaker Emil Stjernholm (Lund University, Sweden) talked about his new research project that looks at television as a medium for government information and the role of the Swedish Television in particular as a communication tool for government. A key component of the research will be the analysis of Anslagstavlan (a bulletin programme introduced in 1972) and Emil shared some thoughts and insights of how the collection will be analysed using digital methods – a topic we returned to in our afternoon session. Eskil Vesterlund (Lund University, Sweden) presented an overview of his ongoing PhD research that aim to historicise opinion polls by studying the Swedish Gallup Institute, and the Gallup poll as a media technology in the 1940s and 1950s, asking the question: how did Gallup polls represent and mediate the world? The final introductory presentation came from John Walsh (National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland) who talked about the significance of Irish pirate radio 1978-1988 for politics, economy, society, culture and technology, and its transnational dimensions. We were also introduced to the work that has been done to build and develop the Irish Pirate Radio Audio Archive and were also treated to an audio excursion of Irish pirate radio. The session produced interesting questions and discussion and as a network we welcome our new members and look forward to follow the different projects and research as they progress.

The afternoon panel focused in on the theme of the conference: ‘Digital Sources, Digital Methods’. The first talk “Big Bird Twitter: Scalable readings of Sesame Street remembrance on a social media platform” was presented by a team at Aarhus University (Denmark) led by Helle Strandgaard Jensen, who together with colleagues Alexander Ulrich Thygesen, Josephine Møller Jensen, and Max Odsbjerg Pedersen, asked the question: “How is Sesame Street being remembered on Twitter?” The team shared initial findings and useful recommendations including suggestions of resources available online such as The Programming Historian: Beginners Guide to Twitter Data. From Twitter and Sesame Street we then moved to Cold War tourist guidebooks. In the talk “Mapping tourist guidebooks: Digital approaches to the history of attractions”, Sune Bechmann Pedersen (Lund University, Sweden) shared observations from using geocoding to map places of interest listed in post-war guidebooks (aimed at Western tourists) to Communist Europe. The aim; to move away from simply qualitative analysis of travel guides and consider what results would be generated with a quantitative approach? Of particular interest, what would the mapping look like over a longer period of time? Tentative findings indicated some interesting continuities in what tourist attractions were promoted before and during the Cold War. The last speaker in the session was Frédéric Clavert (C2DH, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg), the Managing Editor of The Journal of Digital History, whose talk “The Journal of Digital History and the multi-layered article” presented good insights and an introduction to writing digital history. The journal was launched in 2020 and aims to promote “a new form of data-driven scholarship and of transmedia storytelling in the historical sciences” – with the guiding principle of multi-layered articles. The panel provided fascinating insights in how to use and work with digital sources and digital methods. This was a good reminder (to some of us!) of how digital literacy can enhance our research, data collection, and analysis. The sharing of ideas and experience in using digital sources and methods will surely be a theme to be continued within EMHIS.  

The day closed with some reflections and a look to the future. There are plans for funding applications and the continuation of the very successful EMHIS Lunch Webinar series (launched in February 2021) so watch this space for further details about the autumn webinar schedule. It was lovely to be part of the EMHIS spirit again and we are looking forward to the next Forum where we will hopefully be able to meet in real life!

Report written by Kristin Skoog, Bournemouth University, UK

May 31, 2021

This entry was posted in

Conferences EMHIS Fora Members Workshops

Comments

0 Comments Leave a comment

‘Parliament and Media’ – an online EMHIS symposium 20 May 2021

Social media interview with Bernd Lange, EU parliament. Wikimedia Commons CC-BY-4.0: © European Union 2020 – Source: EP

On 20–21 May, EMHIS holds its ninth conference called EMHIS Forum IX. The first of these two days has the specific theme of ‘Parliament & Media’ and this day is open to everyone interested in the evolving love-hate relationship between parliamentarians and media over the last two centuries. We hope you will be able to join us, listen to interesting presentations and take part in the discussion!

From the programme (please note that it is Central European Time):

9.20 Opening remarks by Betto van Waarden (Lund)

9.30 Panel 1: Parliaments’ own Media Communications 

Betto van Waarden (Lund), joined by Mathias Johansson (Lund) during Q&A, Ian Harris (Leicester), Hilde Lavell (Radboud), joined by Carla Hoetink (Radboud) during Q&A, Sally Young (Melbourne). Moderator: Martin Sundby (Lund).

13.00 Panel 2: Parliamentary Reporting. Marcel Broersma (Groningen), Matti La Mela (Helsinki/Uppsala). Moderator: Michael Bossetta (Lund).

14.30 Panel 3: The Media as ‘Parliament’. Marco Althaus (Alfelder Zeitung), Solange Ploeg (Radboud), joined by Carla Hoetink (Radboud) during Q&A. Moderator: Harm Kaal (Radboud).

16.00 Keynote: The Congressional Press Galleries: Causes and consequences of self-regulation. Donald Ritchie (US Senate). Moderator: Betto van Waarden (Lund).

The conference organiser of this day is Dr. Betto van Waarden, as a part of his MSCA research fellowship at Lund University. Please send Betto a mail (see address on his webpage, link above) to retrieve the full programme and the Zoom link for the event.

Welcome!

April 20, 2021

This entry was posted in

Conferences EMHIS Fora Workshops

Comments

0 Comments Leave a comment

New EMHIS members

In the last few months, we have been delighted to welcome six new members to the EMHIS network:

Hermann Breitenborn (Hamburg University, Germany)

Natasha Kitcher (Loughborough University, UK)

Mari Pajala (University of Turku, Finland)

John Walsh (National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland)

Eskil Vesterlund (Lund University, Sweden)

Emil Stjernholm (Lund University, Sweden)

We are really happy to have you joining us and look forward to hear more about your research areas which range from film and television to pirate radio and the history of the electrophone. Welcome!

“Electrophone 1901”, George R. Sims, Wikimedia Commons/US public domain.

 

January 26, 2021

This entry was posted in

Members

Comments

0 Comments Leave a comment

Lunch webinar series 2021

Happy new year, everyone!

We are excited to present the new spring Lunch Webinar Series, which will run from February until June 2021. In line with the general ambition of EMHIS to support PhD students and early career researchers in media history, but also considering these trying times with the Covid-19 pandemic and the difficulties to travel and present your work, we have provided space for this group in particular. The lunch seminars will be one-hour long with a 30 mins presentation followed by a discussion. If you are interested to join in, please send a mail to one of the organisers: Marie Cronqvist or Jamie Medhurst (addresses below).

Welcome!

 

January 15, 2021

This entry was posted in

Presentations Research projects Seminars

Comments

0 Comments Leave a comment

Media history in Lund receives grant to promote digital history

A new partnership between the Section for Media History and the Lund Centre for the History of Knowledge (LUCK) to promote digital history receives 3.3 million SEK from the Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology at Lund University. Named DigitalHistory@Lund, the new platform will support digital history research and digitization projects at Lund University.

Launching in January 2021, DigitalHistory@Lund aims to integrate existing digital history research, support the development of new projects, promote digital history skills, and build closer ties with partners outside academia.

DigitalHistory@Lund is coordinated by Media History and LUCK, and it involves faculty members in a wide range of historical subjects at Lund, as well as partners at the Humanities Lab, Lund University Library, and the National Library of Sweden.

The initiative is headed by Marie Cronqvist and Sune Bechmann Pedersen (Media History) and Kajsa Weber (History), together with a full-time research engineer dedicated to assisting faculty members with digital history projects. The ambition for the 2-year initiative is to develop new successful projects that will ensure a sustained focus on the challenges and opportunities of digital history in Sweden.

The Lund team is looking forward to collaborate with other EMHIS colleagues and together strengthen our competence in the field of digital history!

/ Marie Cronqvist & Sune Bechmann Pedersen

October 16, 2020

This entry was posted in

Funding Lund Research funding

Comments

0 Comments Leave a comment

Betto van Waarden new MSCA fellow at Lund University

All members of the Section for Media History at Lund University are delighted to welcome EMHIS member Dr Betto van Waarden from Leuven University, Belgium, as one of our colleagues for two years within the Horizon 2020 programme Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions for Post Doc Researchers.

During his time in Lund, Betto will be working with his interesting project entitled  ‘Presenting Parliament: Parliamentarians’ visions of the communication and role of parliament within the mediated democracies of Britain, Belgium and the Netherlands, 1844-1995’. Supervisor in Lund is Marie Cronqvist and co-supervisor is Ulrika Holgersson. Read more about Betto’s research on the Lund University research portal.

 

Another wonderful outcome of the EMHIS network collaboration! Congratulations, Betto!

 

Featured image: House of Commons, UK, Wikimedia Commons

 

October 15, 2020

Comments

0 Comments Leave a comment

Sonic traces of VE day 1945: Germany

Tuesday 8 May 1945, is widely known as Victory in Europe (VE) Day. Although the Second World War officially came to an end, not all Europeans celebrated the date. 8 May was experienced differently by people all over Europe. Most of them coped with everyday problems depending on the various situations they lived in: as a soldier of the German Wehrmacht or the Allied troops, as a housewife preparing a meal or living in an emergency shelter, as a survivor of the Holocaust in one of the liberated concentration camps or as a perpetrator who stood accused. Without personal documents we can only imagine what might have shaped people’s experiences of this day. But as far media coverage has been preserved, we can at least analyse what these people were told by the media of the time: reports by newspapers and the radio, news by broadsheets and loudspeakers that marked the end of the war. Of course, facts about the acceptance of the unconditional surrender of Germany’s armed forces by the Allies were inextricably interwoven with interpretations of what this event should mean for the contemporary readers, listeners and bystanders.

This is the third of three blog entries about the sonic traces of May 1945 in Britain, Germany and Sweden (authors Hugh Chignell, Hans-Ulrich Wagner and Marie Cronqvist) and the messages given by radio to the people who got in contact with them. They are radio sources from a victor, a loser, and a neutral. We consider such documents as relics of communicative processes in the past. This means that we consider them sources of past speaking and writing while looking for traces of past listening and reading historians lack so often.

These days, people in Germany can watch and listen to a long array of documentaries that all deal with the end of the Second World War 75 years ago. Since 1985 which then marked the 40th anniversary of unconditional surrender of the German Wehrmacht, the end of the Nazi government and the occupation by Allied troops, Germans have been discussing what VE Day means for them. For quite a long time, the understanding of being liberated was predominant. But right-wing voices are more and more challenging this interpretation by emphasising defeat, losses, and all the suffering in the rubble years.

Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel signing the final surrender terms on 8 May 1945 in Berlin (source: Wikimedia, public domain)

Against this background, I would like to draw the attention to two radio documents of May 1945 – clips that reveal the clash of various interpretations given to the contemporary audience of May 1945.

The first document is the radio speech given by Großadmiral Dönitz on 8 May 1945. The document has been preserved at the German Broadcasting Archive (Deutsches Rundfunkarchiv, DRA) and can be listened to in its special online dossier. BBC Monitoring Transcripts reveal that it was broadcast at 12.30.

Sender Flensburg: Rundfunkansprache von Großadmiral Dönitz zur Kapitulation des Deutschen Reiches (KONF 2833984)

After Hitler’s suicide on April, 30, Karl Dönitz became Reichspräsident of the German Reich. He and some high-ranked military officers and ministers escaped from Berlin and fled to Flensburg, in the north of Germany on the Danish border. The transmitter and the relay station there became a small radio station from which the Nazi government could address the German audience – at that time already under control of the British troops. The speech doesn’t merely give the factual information of unconditional surrender. Germans listening to this broadcast were also told that the ‘the unity of State and Party no longer exists’. Dönitz represents himself as a noble statesman dedicated to serve the German people (deutsches Volk). He both commemorates German fortitude and martyrdom (Tapferkeit und Opfertat) and appeals urgently on German strength and will (Kraft und Wille) which shall become the basis of a peaceful Europe.

The second document corresponds with this last address by the Nazi leadership. It is a BBC reportage recorded on 8 May 1945 in Lüneburg, a city in Lower Saxony, 50 kilometers away from Hamburg. Unfortunately, this clip hasn’t been published yet, so it can’t be linked to the sound document itself.

The reportage is about the announcement of armistice in Lüneburg. “Hello BBC, this is D-Day in Germany. And here in the old town of Luneburg …” the reporter starts. The BBC journalist tells his audience that Lüneburg inhabitants had been requested to gather at the market place at 4 o’clock and to listen to their mayor. For quite a long time, the reportage transmits the German speech about unconditional surrender given from the balcony. But what makes this reportage an outstanding document is the notice of the reporter which follows at the end of the clip: “as the announcement is made, the Germans stand listening to it silently, not a comment, not a movement among the crowd… they pause for a moment and then without comment the crowd starts to disperse”. This observation reveals something about German people’s mood at the end of the Second World War. There are no methodological reasons to call into question what the reporter says about people’s reactions. So the reportage turns out to be a proof for historians stating that Germans in May 1945 were somehow emotionless, incapable of suffering and acting, without pity, without compassion, not interested in politics and plans for future as mentioned in the propaganda speech by Admiral Dönitz. The BBC reportage was obviously broadcast on 8 May 1945. It ends up with an address to its British audience: “We in the crowd in British uniform can imagine a different D-Day”, a D-Day in Britain with excitement and flags. “Here in the town square of Luneburg is the other side of the picture.” What a wonderful British-German entangled sound document!

Zero Hour or not? Since the 1980s a huge amount of books have been published especially in Germany. (Photo: Hans-Ulrich Wagner)

/ Hans-Ulrich Wagner, Hamburg

 

May 7, 2020

This entry was posted in

Archives Lund Outreach

Comments

0 Comments Leave a comment

Sonic traces of VE day 1945: Britain

Tuesday 8 May 1945, is widely known as Victory in Europe (VE) Day. Although the Second World War officially came to an end, not all Europeans celebrated the date. 8 May was experienced differently by people all over Europe. Most of them coped with everyday problems depending on the various situations they lived in: as a soldier of the German Wehrmacht or the Allied troops, as a housewife preparing a meal or living in an emergency shelter, as a survivor of the Holocaust in one of the liberated concentration camps or as a perpetrator who stood accused. Without personal documents we can only imagine what might have shaped people’s experiences of this day. But as far media coverage has been preserved, we can at least analyse what these people were told by the media of the time: reports by newspapers and the radio, news by broadsheets and loudspeakers that marked the end of the war. Of course, facts about the acceptance of the unconditional surrender of Germany’s armed forces by the Allies were inextricably interwoven with interpretations of what this event should mean for the contemporary readers, listeners and bystanders.

This is the first of three blog entries about the sonic traces of May 1945 in Britain, Germany and Sweden (authors Hugh Chignell, Hans-Ulrich Wagner and Marie Cronqvist) and the messages given by radio to the people who got in contact with them. They are radio sources from a victor, a loser, and a neutral. We consider such documents as relics of communicative processes in the past. This means that we consider them sources of past speaking and writing while looking for traces of past listening and reading historians lack so often.

Churchill waves to crowd (source: Wikimedia, public domain)

Most historical accounts of Victory in Europe Day (VE Day) focus on London and the gathering of huge crowds around Buckingham Palace and Trafalgar Square – the traditional meeting places for celebrations in the capital. The celebrations had been triggered by Hitler’s assassination on 30 April followed by the complete surrender of German forces at 02.14 on 7 May.  The following recording tells us little but its sheer mundane authenticity; the sound of repeated car horns, whistles and cheers somehow connects us to what must have been a day of great relief and joy. 

VE Day Buckingham Palace (recording copyright BBC)

The BBC was not only central to celebrations and commemoration, it had earned that right over the last six years, and at 15:00 on 8 May it broadcast Churchill’s victory speech, ‘the evil doers now lie prostrate before us’.  In Sian Nicholas’ definitive account of the BBC and the war she writes with authority of the tremendous success of VE Day broadcasts. After Churchill had been heard by 71% of the population (some listening to his words broadcast through loud speakers fixed to trees) Victory Celebrations was a programme designed to bring the London festivities to everyone in the land. Later that evening, with a certain inevitability, listeners were treated to a Tribute to the King featuring voices from around the Empire. The following week, J B Priestley, who had so brilliantly captured the public mood in the early years of the war was allowed to sound a note of caution warning that ‘the scene is grim and ruinous; and the journey must continue … Europe must be put together.’

Two girls at VE Day 1945, Battersea, London. (source: Wikimedia, public domain, IWM Non-Commercial License)

The scenes of crowds wearing paper hats, shouting and singing would have been against a grimmer back drop.  London a shattered city, like so many throughout Europe, everywhere blackened by fire, rubble in huge heaps, ominous gaps in rows of houses. The crowds sang but as one 50 year old man remarked, ‘It was just like this after the last war and twelve months later we was standing in dole queues.’ 

Further reading and listening: David Hendy’s article on VE Day the History of the BBC webpage

/ Hugh Chignell, Bournemouth

 

May 7, 2020

This entry was posted in

Archives Hamburg Outreach

Comments

0 Comments Leave a comment

Sonic traces of VE Day 1945: Sweden

Tuesday 8 May 1945, is widely known as Victory in Europe (VE) Day. Although the Second World War officially came to an end, not all Europeans celebrated the date. 8 May was experienced differently by people all over Europe. Most of them coped with everyday problems depending on the various situations they lived in: as a soldier of the German Wehrmacht or the Allied troops, as a housewife preparing a meal or living in an emergency shelter, as a survivor of the Holocaust in one of the liberated concentration camps or as a perpetrator who stood accused. Without personal documents we can only imagine what might have shaped people’s experiences of this day. But as far media coverage has been preserved, we can at least analyse what these people were told by the media of the time: reports by newspapers and the radio, news by broadsheets and loudspeakers that marked the end of the war. Of course, facts about the acceptance of the unconditional surrender of Germany’s armed forces by the Allies were inextricably interwoven with interpretations of what this event should mean for the contemporary readers, listeners and bystanders.

This is the second of three blog entries about the sonic traces of May 1945 in Britain, Germany and Sweden (authors Hugh Chignell, Hans-Ulrich Wagner and Marie Cronqvist) and the messages given by radio to the people who got in contact with them. They are radio sources from a victor, a loser, and a neutral. We consider such documents as relics of communicative processes in the past. This means that we consider them sources of past speaking and writing while looking for traces of past listening and reading historians lack so often.

In neutral Sweden, the liberation of “Norden” was an overarching theme on radio from 7 to 9 May 1945 – in broadcast speeches, radio reports and news bulletins. ”It feels like a long nightmare has finally released its grip and we can breathe again”, said prime minister Per Albin Hansson in his first radio speech shortly after the German surrender on 7 May. “Even if we Swedes have not been directly involved in the battle, we still realize what this means for our country and our people.” He emphasized the unyielding Nordic spirit and the joy that the Swedish people felt about their brothers and neighbours. That Sweden has managed to keep neutral and successfully avoid the lines of battle was not, Hansson stressed, a matter to boast about but instead a strike of good luck to be humbly grateful for.

Per Albin Hansson, radio speech 7 May, 1945 (source: Sveriges Radio)

Among the perhaps most emotional audio clips that can be found in the audio archive are a couple of recordings focusing merely on city sounds from Kungsgatan in Stockholm on the same day, 7 of May. In one of them, reporter Gunnar Helén stood on the roof of a garbage truck describing to the listener the spectacular visual scene before him: waving hands and flags, traffic jam, and confetti, office papers and paper streamers thrown from the windows. On the recording we hear people cheering, and an incessant sounding of car horns and laughter. After a while, someone takes up singing the Danish national anthem and others quickly join in. Then the singing crowd gets bigger continuing with the Norwegian and finally the Swedish anthems. Happy people on the street, both Danes, Norwegians and Swedes, are interviewed.

Gunnar Helén reporting from the festivities at Kungsgatan in Stockholm 7 May, 1945 (source: Sveriges Radio)

  Iconic newsreel from Kungsgatan, Stockholm (source: Svenska filminstitutet, SVT/SMDB, retrieved from Stockholmskällan)

The Nordic theme was followed up on 8 May, when Hansson spoke again to cheering crowds in the central park Vasaparken in Stockholm. He was joined by Norwegian Labour party politician Lars Evensen, a member of the resistance movement (Hjemmefronten) and during the war in exile working at the Norwegian legation in Stockholm. “You can say that Norden has never been more alive with the Swedes,” Hansson stated, “than during these last few years. With every fibre in our body, we have felt with our brothers and sisters in Norway and Denmark.”

Among the remaining audio clips is also a travel report from 9 May by legendary radio reporter and host Sven Jerring about a brief undercover visit to Copenhagen shortly before the German surrender. Jerring tells the listener about an accidental but fortunate meeting on the street with a Danish colleague, who travelled around with his radio equipment on a trailer. The two reporters joined forces, and in Jerring’s report, the whole anecdote serves as an illustration not only of the unity and cooperation between the Nordic countries. It also forcefully reproduced what Nick Couldry has called “the myth of the mediated centre”, putting broadcast radio in the centre of world events.

Sven Jerring’s travel report from Copenhagen 9 May, 1945 (source: Sveriges Radio)

/ Marie Cronqvist, Lund

May 7, 2020

This entry was posted in

Archives Bournemouth Outreach

Comments

0 Comments Leave a comment

From the British members of EMHIS steering group

Since its launch in 2012, Bournemouth, and more recently, Aberystwyth universities have participated in EMHIS. Over the years we have attended and organised forums, co-authored journal articles, presented our work and enjoyed the friendship, hospitality and scholarship of our Swedish and German colleagues. Much of was paid for by the Swedish government’s STINT fund.

But now Britain has left the EU and there is a nationalist government in power. What that will mean practically time will tell but as the EMHIS British contingent we wanted to make a statement. 

We are deeply committed to our European project. We enormously value our Swedish and German friends and all of our European colleagues. We celebrate the transnational, progressive, diverse, feminist and experimental project that is Entangled Media Histories and we will remain in Europe – in Lund, in Hamburg and absolutely opposed to the petty minded nationalism of Brexit. 

Thank you EMHIS for welcoming us into your entangled European home and together lets prove that British scholars are better off in Europe than outside!

Hugh Chignell, Jamie Medhurst and Kristin Skoog

London calling post Brexit.
February 4, 2020

This entry was posted in

Bournemouth EMHIS Research exchanges Members

Comments

0 Comments Leave a comment

“Entangled Media Histories” special issue now in print

We are really happy that all articles in the EMHIS special issue of Media History (Routledge, Taylor & Francis, vol 26, no 1, 2020) is now available in print. This is a joint venture that has been under way since our “Tracing entanglements in media history” conference at Lund University, Sweden, in May 2017, where most articles were once presented as papers. It has been lovely to see them all taking shape over the course of the peer review process during the last two years. Big thanks to all anonymous peer reviewers, whose comments and suggestions have made the texts better, and most of all to all authors for their wonderful input and their patience along the way! 

Marie, Christoph & Hugh (special issue editors)

January 20, 2020

This entry was posted in

Bournemouth Hamburg Lund Publications

Comments

0 Comments Leave a comment

Handbook chapter on media after 1945 out: A report of EMHIS colleagues’ joint writing

What seems to be a matter of course within academia today, is far from being easily done. I talk about the endeavour of jointly writing a handbook chapter as a five-colleague team located in four different cities Hamburg, Lund, Bournemouth and Munich. I checked on my computer that I brought in the idea to contribute to the then planned ‘Handbook of European Communication History’ quite a long time ago, in mid-2013. As an immediate result of this initiative I was elected lead author. Along with four EMHIS colleagues, Marie Cronqvist, Kristin Skoog, Hugh Chignell, and Christoph Hilgert, we successfully applied a proposal on ‘Media after 1945: Continuities and New Beginnings’. Later on, we worked out the chapter, worked in reviewers’ occasionally contrastive recommendations and at the end proof-read what was sent to us by Wiley Blackwell several times. We did this, because up to now, we consider it a great opportunity to write about entangled media history.

How to write a 9.000 word-text on a period of transition in an entangled way? For us, it was clear that we do not only put together three case studies – one written from the perspective of a victorious country (UK), one from the perspective of a defeated state (Germany divided into four occupation zones), and one from the perspective of an officially neutral state during World War II (Sweden). In an amount of emails, Skype conferences and Google docs documents a new structure emerged. We decided on dealing with ‘the media landscape in Europe at the end of WW II’ (covering print media, radio, film and TV plans), with the question of ‘established’ and/or ‘new orders’ which means with media policy and media systems, and with – what we called – ‘key topics in the immediate post-war period’, i.e. how the media after 1945 dealt with everyday problems, the visions of the future, and the management of national identity. Whenever it was possible we also worked in information from other countries, especially from South and East Europe, supported by our media history colleagues Alec Badenoch, Gloria García González, Morten Michelsen, and Darina Volf.

Of course, these few blog sentences invite you to read about ‘the continuities and new beginnings’ the team found out and what we ‘entangled’ so far. Maybe you are curious to know more about Sweden’s idea of ‘folkhemmet’ which means ‘the people’s home’ and the future of a welfare society; or to read more about the transition when the nation-wide Nazi-Newspaper ‘Völkischer Beobachter’ was published until 24 April 1945 and the very first new German newspaper under control of the Military Government, the ‘Aachener Nachrichten’, which was out on 24 January 1945; or to recognise problems of the female staff at the BBC, of women in a male dominated profession. As a matter of course, all national examples like these are embedded in a transnational context.

Finally, worth mentioning might be that we decided that several developments didn’t start on 8 May 1945, the ‘Victory in Europe’ (VE) Day, but already in 1943/44. And of course, we state that transformation processes didn’t come to an end in 1947/48. On the contrary, Europe became more and more shaped by two ‘blocs’ and a so-called ‘Cold War’, also on air – but this is described by other colleagues in the following chapter of the handbook.

Hans-Ulrich Wagner, Hamburg

 

Hans-Ulrich Wagner, Hugh Chignell, Marie Cronqvist, Christoph Hilgert, Kristin Skoog: Media after 1945: Continuities and New Beginnings. In: Klaus Arnold, Paschal Preston, Susanne Kinnebrock (Eds.): The Handbook of European Communication History. London: Wiley 2020, 189-204.

 

December 17, 2019

This entry was posted in

Bournemouth Hamburg Lund Publications

Comments

0 Comments Leave a comment

Older Posts